September 11th of 2001 was by for one of the worst days in American History. Many lives were needlessly lost and other lives changed forever. Any way you look at it, the attacks were bad. There are multiple ideas as to who was responsible but, regardless of who the culprit was, by the very definition of terrorism, it was a terrorist attack. I want to make clear that I, in no way, am trying to minimize the damage done during the attacks and it isn’t my intentions to either dishonor those who died that day or offend their relatives who had to suffer because of their profound losses. I do want to discuss both the true causes for the attacks and why they couldn’t have possibly happened the way we have been told.September 11th of 2001 was by for one of the worst days in American History. Many lives were needlessly lost and other lives changed forever. Any way you look at it, the attacks were bad. There are multiple ideas as to who was responsible but, regardless of who the culprit was, by the very definition of terrorism, it was a terrorist attack. I want to make clear that I, in no way, am trying to minimize the damage done during the attacks and it isn’t my intentions to either dishonor those who died that day or offend their relatives who had to suffer because of their profound losses. I do want to discuss both the true causes for the attacks and why they couldn’t have possibly happened the way we have been told.
I’m not trying to be objective in writing this. I don’t think that would even be possible. I’m passionate about that day just like so many other people. Because of my passion, I have done extensive research into the attacks and I have found multiple mistakes and inconsistencies in reports published by our government and I’ve found examples of why what we have been told is a physical impossibility. The 9/11 Commission Report was published in July of 2004. In the report, statements and accusations were made that were not only ridiculous but also complete impossibilities.
First I would like to point out issues that I have uncovered regarding the World Trade Center in New York. We have been told that two skyscrapers were hit by planes and because of this, a fire began that resulted in both buildings falling. What has not been discussed is the fact that a third building, that wasn’t even hit by a plane, fell in a symmetrical manner later on the same day. So we have been told that a high rise building just all of a sudden fell down as if it were a controlled demolition but was a result of damage done by the falling towers earlier that day. We are also led to believe that the towers fell down because of the intense heat created by the fire. First, most of the jet fuel, which is kerosene, blew out of the side of the buildings in a big fire ball. Second, according to many experts, the temperature of the fires were not hot enough to cause the failure of the steel leading to the towers collapse. Third, there was another building that seems to have just fallen down for no reason whatsoever. Stories told by those who were actually there also contradict the Commission Report.
Now let’s look at the pentagon. There was one video released to the public and that came from a nearby gas station. We are expected to believe that the US Pentagon and all of its security did not produce one single surveillance video showing a plane slamming into the building. Also called into question was whether the plan supposedly used would have been physically capable of such a maneuver without stalling and falling out of the sky. We are to believe that the man flying the plane, who was characterized by his former flight instructor as a terrible pilot when flying a single engine Cessna, was able to perform such a maneuver that he was able to fly a jumbo jet into the side of the pentagon. Now let’s look at some facts regarding this attack. Immediate photographs that were released do not show a tail section of the plane anywhere near the pentagon. On that particular plane, there are Rolls Royce Engines that are close to the size of school busses but there isn’t one engine visible in photographs. Using basic physics, there is a total impossibility that a plane flew into the building and there is no tail section visible. We were told that the plane was traveling at such a speed that the plane just totally disintegrated on impact. Using basic physics, the plane could have been traveling at 200mph or at 2000mph and the tail section would have still ended up on the pentagon lawn.
Lastly, I would like to point out problems in the report, regarding the plane crashing in PA. According to people on the scene and is also evident in photographs, there isn’t a plane in that field following the supposed crash. Compare any photograph of a previous plane crash to the photographs in PA and you will see the difference. Once again I would like to point out the tail section of a plane. Even if the plane were traveling at several thousand miles per hour and it dove straight into the ground at a 180 degree angle, a tail section would still be visible. It is totally impossible that the airplane crashed at such a speed that the entire plane just buried itself. That part of the report borders on total ridiculousness.
Ask me well if the planes didn’t crash, were did they go and I will tell you that I don’t know. I didn’t say that the planes crashed. I am only going on what evidence I did find. Regardless of where the planes went and what actually did hit the pentagon, the attacks were horrible and unforgivable acts and, because of this, the truth should be sought. I will not try to guess and say who I think may have been responsible. What I will say is that it certainly didn’t happen the way that we have been told.
Former Vance County Commissioner